This year, CPN honors the work of
Rue Cromwell by bestowing on him its ‘Lifetime Achievement Award’.
At the Gala Banquet of the Memphis conference, Dr. Cromwell was
presented the award by one of his former students, Dr. Ken Sewell.
When approached by the
Chronicle for biographical
information, Rue indicated that he already had some on file, in
particular, a “Color Bio” (written in a style much like the color
commentary one hears on televised sports). When it was
received by the Chronicle, the delightful piece was too lengthy for
a single issue, but too much of a gem to edit down. It was
decided instead to deliver the bio in two parts. What follows
is Part I of “The Color Bio of Rue Cromwell, by Rue Cromwell.”
Part II is scheduled to appear in the Spring 2005 issue of the
Constructivist Chronicle.
Enjoy.
Rue L. Cromwell grew up in Indiana among hills created by the
southern boundary of the ice sheet. The closest playmate was over a
mile away. Very early he found swimming the stripper holes and
roaming the forests and creeks were more fun that coaxing cows all
day away from a broken pasture fence. Lots of time there was to
think and dream. Then he entered a rural one-room brick
schoolhouse. With this lucky circumstance he could listen to the
seven upper grades recite before the teacher, later on review what
he had overlooked from the lower grades, and compete with all grades
in the weekly spelling bee.
Moving closer to Linton, Indiana (and now into a two-room school
house) at the onset of World War II, Rue joined a newly started Boy
Scout troop. Suddenly, however, he was beset with running the
troop, as all able-bodied Scoutmasters and would-be’s left for
military service. It was a miserable time. What he later learned
about effective rearing and discipline would have been helpful. As
Rue was training his group for statewide first aid contest news came
of President Roosevelt’s death. The Scout work led to Rue’s being
appointed for four consecutive summers as Waterfront Director for
the regional summer camp. Since this position involved management,
program development, and safety, as well as swimming, life saving,
rowing, and canoeing instruction, a “proxy name” of a person over 21
was entered for the record. At a tall 129 pounds Rue was arguably
viewed as the “skinniest waterfront director” in the United States.
Cromwell was nailed with only one breach of conduct during those
four years. Coming in after midnight from his night off, he and a
fellow staffer ate over a gallon of ice cream from the kitchen
freezer in the mess hall. Among other disciplinary actions Rue was
required to lead songs at lunchtime for the rest of his career of in
summer camping. This song-leading career ended in the summer 1949
with Rue drilling a cadet platoon at ROTC camp on the grounds of
Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio.
As these four Scout summers came to finality two brief but
significant challenges came. First, the Boy Scout honorary society
(Order of Arrow) scheduled its first national convention at the
nearby Indiana University. Rue played a major role in local
arrangements and hosting. Second, at the end of that final summer
Rue filled in as the Waterfront Director for the regional Girl Scout
camp. That was another story altogether.
When Rue entered Indiana University midway in his summer camp staff
tenure he was torn among three career choices: (a) his major desire
to seek appointment and enter the U. S. Military Academy at West
Point; (b) to major in psychology, because a local truck driver said
it was “deep.” No psychologist was to be encountered, and no
psychology book existed in the local public library. The same
anonymous truck driver urged Rue to get as much math as possible in
school; and (c), to continue in the Boy Scout movement on a
professional level.
The dilemma resolved itself during Rue’s first year in college. He
learned that professional Scouting was primarily fund-raising rather
than working with kids, camps, and nature, so that option was
eliminated. As for the other two, Rue entered college in 1946 along
1000s of veterans returning from World War II with support of the GI
Bill. In his college rooming house Rue was the only “non-vet”
youngster. The veterans were resentful of the time they had lost in
service, of the chaos, cruelty, and loss of personal control in war.
When they learned of Rue’s newly arrived letter of competitive award
to West Point they proclaimed to each other the futility of wasting
one’s life as a peacetime Army officer. Quietly they retired for a
meeting and vote. The decision was to brainwash Rue out of his
military career idea. Their project involved not only intense
discussion but also lots of double-dating and generous loaning of
their cars whenever Rue desired. Rue soon decided that Indiana
University was where the diverse academic stimulation and the girls
lay.
At the end of his freshman year Rue was hired as a research
assistant, assistant surgeon, anesthetist, and resident caretaker in
the experimental dog lab of Professor W. N. Kellogg. “Keep the name
Rue,” he said. “It will help get you better known. But add a middle
initial.” The apartment of the dog lab became Rue’s domicile for
the undergrad duration. The only infraction suffered during that era
came after midnight when Cromwell administered Vicks VapoRub to an
operated dog unable to breath owing to congestion. The treatment
was successful, but Rue received a severe reprimand and a stiff
lecture on controlling variables in experimental research.”
In his sophomore year Rue was elected to Psi Chi, the undergraduate
psychology honorary society. Professor B. F. Skinner, then
department chair, conducted the induction despite the use of a
candle and occasional dualistic language in the ceremony text.
During the following year Skinner was gone (to Harvard) and Rue
became president of the Psi Chi chapter.
In 1950 Rue, along with receiving an AB degree in psychology, was
also awarded a commission as second lieutenant in the U. S. Army Air
Force (soon to become the U. S. Air Force). In a summer of quick
successions he reported to Selfridge Air Force Base near Detroit for
duty. The Korean War broke out. Cromwell was then discharged from
the Air Force because he had been admitted to a clinical psychology
graduate program. Clinical psychology had been declared a COS
(critical occupational specialty) by the federal government because
of the onslaught of World War II veterans entering VA
neuropsychiatry treatment centers. Next came a wedding, a quick
honeymoon at Indian Lake on the way to Columbus. Finally at the
Ohio State University Cromwell settled into the life of a first year
graduate student. This was two years after a then rotund George A.
Kelly had arrived as Director of Clinical Training.
The Ohio State University Psychology Clinic in Arps Hall had already
become historic. Henry Goddard founded it and Carl Rogers had later
held the directorship. Cromwell began his master’s research with
Kelly. Rue had derived some hypotheses from Freud’s statements
about memory, repression, and pleasure principle. Although Kelly
was in the middle of writing his two volumes he accepted and
encouraged a study that was in the face of current assertions that
nothing in Freud’s theory was testable. Eventually, however, a bit
of personal construct theory also entered the thesis. For
Cromwell, however, it was the worst of times. Kelly found Rue’s
writing style intolerable. Also, while away in Chillicothe on VA
internship Rue joined two-thirds of the graduate student body in
flunking the psychology qualifying exams (generals) on the first
try.
Before entering graduate school Cromwell had decided to work with
numerous professors to broaden his personal knowledge. So, after
the master’s thesis he shifted to Professor Julian B. Rotter for his
PhD dissertation. In addition he did an animal study with Professor
Delos Wickens. With Rotter’s research team a dissertation problem
was developed to examine how various expectancy/reinforcement value
combinations compared with the objective actuarial frequencies of
expected value pay-off. Findings indicated that adults veered to
choosing conservative “sure bets” and venturesome “long shots”
rather than intermediate combinations of expectancy and reward.
Actuarial outcome of pay-off was, of course, equal for all choices.
After an accumulated psychodiagnostic year and a solely outpatient
psychotherapeutic year in the VA program (with Kelly, Rotter, and
other professors as consulting supervisors) a highly stimulating
summer was spent as psychologist at the Ohio Bureau of Juvenile
Research (BJR) (later to be called the Ohio Juvenile Diagnostic
Center; JDC). Henry Goddard had conceived this state agency near
the time he translated the Binet test into English. The courts and
other agencies referred children and youth to this residential
facility. They participated in a strictly 60-day period of
residency and study with an interdisciplinary (mental
health/social/educational) team headed by a psychologist. As the 60
days drew to a close the results, conference notes, and reports from
team members were used by the psychologist to develop a written plan
for future living placement, psychological treatment, school
placement, and educational goals. The report, with its itemized
recommendations was presented to the judge or other referring
authority. Usually the psychologist also met with the referring
authority to defend on or more specific items of recommendation.
Returning to the Ohio State campus for his final year Cromwell was,
to his surprise, appointed Assistant Instructor and Clinic
Coordinator of the Psychological Clinic in Arps Hall. Rotter had
become director, and it was Kelly’s turn to supervise practicum.
Cromwell’s job as Clinic Coordinator was to perform intake
examinations on all clients, manage the clinical file of each case
until it had been closed, come to Kelly’s weekly meetings with his
clinical supervisees, present to the group each of the available
cases, and participate as the case was discussed and assigned by
Kelly. When discussion was complete the students were dismissed to
meet with their assigned cases. Later Cromwell sat in on the
post-contact supervision.
A unique experience in Cromwell’s career was in that window of time
when he sat with Kelly in his office, waiting for the respective
clinical students to complete the initial contact with their
clients. It was a time to engage at length in theoretical,
research, and clinical conversation. Some of the well known traits
and views of Kelly were evident. In his clinical teaching, as Kelly
often said, the student was always to be given autonomy and
wholehearted personal support in his actions and decisions. Such
actions and decisions may be traditional, idiosyncratic, or even
blundering when with the client, but, on the other hand, Kelly
reserved the right to say how he “likely would have done it.” The
weekly conversations of Kelly and Cromwell moved seamlessly among
clinical aspects, laboratory research implications, and theory.
Kelly’s great joy was to involve personal construct theory in the
discussion, but he could not resist veering away from PCP to an
interesting new idea. In these conversations Cromwell experienced
personal construct theory as an ongoing changing dynamic rather than
the postulates and propositions that became locked into place in the
pages of the two volumes. Kelly had an insatiable appetite for new
ideas, a joy in reconstruing each idea in alternate ways. Always
with a six-inch slide rule in his shirt pocket he was quick to
translate relatively abstract variables into some quantitative
model.
Only once during his year as Clinic Coordinator did Cromwell incur
disquiet. It was an era when clinicians and teachers were expected
to be appropriately costumed. For both women and men it was business
dress; no unique hairdos, no beards, no open collars were
acceptable. One day an attractive young woman walked in without
appointment to seek clinical help just as Cromwell dropped by the
Clinic from the rat lab to pick up his mail and messages. He had
just “run his rats” and was garbed in a dirty stained tee shirt and
jeans. Kelly and the clinical faculty found no humor, even though
clinical services, as per policy, were promptly rendered.
Before the days of “equal opportunity rules” professors gave
generously of their time and personal resources to go to national
meetings to seek job opportunities for their graduates. These
efforts resulted in Cromwell becoming an assistant professor at
George Peabody College (now of Vanderbilt University).
In 1953 Peabody College acquired a large federal grant to launch a
graduate training and research program in the then highly neglected
area of mental retardation. It now remains as the longest
continuously funded research project at NIMH. In its beginning,
since no senior person with expertise in both mental retardation and
research methodology could be recruited, the position was split into
two entry-level positions, one in experimental child psychology and
one in clinical. Mental retardations was to be learned “on the
job.” The grant began in 1953. Cromwell completed his Ph.D. degree
in 1955 and joined the program. The first dissertation under
Cromwell’s supervision was in 1957. This research and training
program now remains as the longest continuously funded project of
NIH.
The unique attraction of the
position to Cromwell was the chance and challenge to supervise
doctoral advisees immediately. Both Kelly and Rotter had provided
ample role models for a collegial collaborative style of
supervision. Cromwell’s research focused upon hyperactivity and
also the responses of children to success and failure. During this
time Cromwell also found time to conduct a study on extremity
ratings using personal constructs. This study had emerged from the
weekly talks with Kelly on clinic practicum days.
...end of Part I
See the upcoming Spring 2005 issue
of the Constructivist Chronicle for Part II, the
conclusion of Rue’s ‘Color Bio’.

Rue Cromwell (right) receives CPN's Lifetime
Achievement Award
from Kenneth Sewell at the 2004 conference in
Memphis